Environmental monitoring has been used to formulate general pesticide policies and monitor their progress. Recently, the role of monitoring results in authorisation decisions has gained importance, although still uncertainties about implementation and criteria exist. There are inherent challenges in demonstrating the appropriateness of monitoring results for this use. Abstracts relevant to environmental monitoring are invited, including those that consider:
SESSION CHAIR
SESSION CO-CHAIRS
APPROVED PRESENTATIONS
ID | CORRESPONDING AUTHOR | TITLE |
5 | Martin Alexis | Assessment of silicone rods for passive sampling of pesticides in freshwaters |
9 | Pierlot Frédéric | Comparison of predictive quality of 27 pesticide risk indicators |
20 | Wipfler Louise | Impact of bioturbation on pesticide exposure of benthic organisms: a modelling approach |
80 | Gottesbueren Bernhard | Proposal for options for specifying the groundwater protection goal at national level within the eu |
81 | Kreuger Jenny | Long-term pesticide monitoring in sweden – trends and implications |
82 | Nanos Therese | Transport losses of pesticides – linking usage to surface water findings in four monitoring catchments, sweden |
83 | Sub Kim Chan | Monitoring of pesticides in rivers in korea |
84 | Miles Benedict | Implications of spatial and temporal averaging of concentration data for a pesticide in groundwater at the field scale considering different specific protection goals |
85 | Steinweg Carolien Margot | Use of groundwater monitoring results in the authorisation procedure of plant protection products. A case study in north east netherlands |
86 | Gouy Véronique | Complementarity of passive samplers and bio-indicators to evaluate surface water contamination by pesticides in agricultural catchments |
87 | Loiseau Ludovic | Industry experience with groundwater monitoring: different study types for different purposes |
88 | Malavaud Cécile | Analysis of pesticides surface waters monitoring data in order to identify typical contamination patterns at national scale |
89 | Agert Jutta | Impact of the use of different geodatasets on leaching vulnerability analyses |
90 | Jones Russell L. | Design of ground water monitoring studies |
91 | Baran Nicole | Long term monitoring in an alluvial aquifer: towards the establishment of a link between groundwater quality and uses |
92 | Häring Tim | Comparison of national monitoring catchments of sweden to the swedish groundwater scenarios |
93 | Rosenbom Annette E. | Long-term lessons on pesticide leaching obtained from the danish pesticide leaching assessment programme |
94 | Gimsing Anne Louise | Groundwater monitoring for regulatory purposes – first steps of a setac group to develop a guidance |
95 | Stenrød Marianne | Long-term trends of pesticide use, stream water concentrations and potential environmental risks in small agricultural catchments |
96 | Sweeney Paul John James | What information can we get from monitoring studies? |
97 | Knowles Steve | Eu groundwater monitoring for sustainable agriculture : 1,3-dichloropropene soil fumigant |
98 | Ulrich Uta | Pesticide risk potential of small water bodies |
99 | Spickermann Gregor | Spatial distributed modelling to identify vulnerable leaching areas for monitoring |